Difference between revisions of "Aspect"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{AKA|动作状态 (dòngzuò zhuàngtài) |语态 (yǔtài)}} | {{AKA|动作状态 (dòngzuò zhuàngtài) |语态 (yǔtài)}} | ||
| − | Chinese does not use the concept of formal tenses. Instead, it employs what is called "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_aspect grammatical aspect]." Because Chinese does not have tenses, the question, "''how do you form the past tense in Chinese?''" is | + | Chinese does not use the concept of formal tenses. Instead, it employs what is called "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_aspect grammatical aspect]." Because Chinese does not have tenses, the question, "''how do you form the past tense in Chinese?''" is nonsensical. The real question is, "''how do you refer to events in the past in Chinese?''" You do this through ''aspect'' in Chinese, not tense<ref>See Sinosplice.com: "[http://www.sinosplice.com/life/archives/2009/11/19/aspect-not-tense Aspect, Not Tense]"</ref>. |
== Aspectual Particles == | == Aspectual Particles == | ||
Revision as of 07:13, 17 March 2016
- Also known as: 动作状态 (dòngzuò zhuàngtài) and 语态 (yǔtài).
Chinese does not use the concept of formal tenses. Instead, it employs what is called "grammatical aspect." Because Chinese does not have tenses, the question, "how do you form the past tense in Chinese?" is nonsensical. The real question is, "how do you refer to events in the past in Chinese?" You do this through aspect in Chinese, not tense[1].
Aspectual Particles
Aspect is expressed in Chinese through several key particles (click through for more information on each):
- 了: The Perfective Aspectual Particle
- 过: The Experiential Aspectual Particle
- 着: The Durative Aspectual Particle
Sources and further reading
- ↑ See Sinosplice.com: "Aspect, Not Tense"
- 外国人实用汉语语法(中英文对照) (pp. 403 - 444)
